Helping Nordic companies make confident AI decisions. From vendor evaluation to team adoption, backed by practitioner experience and a global network of AI community leaders.
Every enterprise is being asked the same question right now. How do we use AI? The pressure to move quickly leads to expensive mistakes. Wrong vendor. Wrong use case. Tools that get bought but never adopted.
I work with companies that want to get this right. Not by chasing hype, but by understanding what actually works in practice. I bring hands-on experience building with AI tools, a global view of enterprise adoption patterns, and the ability to translate technical possibilities into business decisions your leadership team can act on.
I'm not selling a specific vendor. I'm helping you figure out what fits your organization, your team, and your goals.
I build with AI tools daily. I've shipped products using OpenAI's API, I work with Claude Code, and I use AI across development, strategy, and operations. When I recommend something, it's because I've used it.
I co-lead the Copenhagen Claude Code community alongside Diana Meda, part of a global network of 90+ AI community leaders across 47+ cities. I see what's working at scale before it shows up in analyst reports.
I've led technology teams in medtech, public sector, and management consulting. I understand procurement, compliance, change management, and the gap between a proof-of-concept and something that actually gets used.
I can prototype a solution Monday and present the business case to your C-suite Friday. Most advisors do one or the other. I do both.
A structured evaluation of where your organization stands with AI and where it should go. We map your current tech stack, team capabilities, and highest-value use cases. You get a clear view of what's possible, what's practical, and what to do first.
What you get
AI readiness scorecard. Prioritized use case map. Vendor comparison across Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and open-source alternatives. A 90-day roadmap your team can execute.
Choosing the right AI platform is a decision that affects your company for years. I help you run proof-of-concept evaluations, compare vendors on criteria that matter to your specific situation, and navigate enterprise agreements with confidence.
Through my community network and industry relationships, I can connect you directly with the right people at AI providers and cloud platforms, and make sure those conversations are productive from the start.
Buying AI tools is easy. Getting your teams to actually use them well is the hard part. I run hands-on workshops, train developers on AI-assisted workflows, set up sustainable practices, and build internal champions who keep momentum going after I leave.
I've seen what makes AI adoption stick and what kills it, across dozens of organizations. That pattern recognition is what you're paying for.
For companies that want a fractional AI advisor on call. Monthly check-ins, quarterly roadmap reviews, and early access to trends and insights from the global AI community network. A lightweight relationship that keeps your AI strategy current without adding headcount.
A 30-minute conversation to understand your situation, goals, and where you're stuck. No pitch. Just an honest assessment of whether I can help.
Based on our conversation, I put together a focused scope of work. Clear deliverables, timeline, and investment. No padding.
I work alongside your team, not above them. Expect workshops, honest feedback, and practical guidance that moves things forward every week.
The goal is always to build your internal capability. When we're done, your team should be more confident making AI decisions on their own.
You're a technology leader, CTO, or head of digital at a Nordic company with 500 to 25,000 employees. You know AI matters for your business, but you're not sure where to start or which vendor to trust. Maybe you've done some experiments but nothing has scaled. Maybe your board is asking questions you don't have answers to yet.
I work across sectors, with particular depth in medtech, healthcare, financial services, energy, and public sector organizations.
If you're at a smaller company or startup, I may not be the right fit. But I'm happy to point you in the right direction.
No. I co-lead a Claude Code community, which gives me deep knowledge of Anthropic's products. But my advisory work is vendor-agnostic. I recommend whatever fits your situation, whether that's Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, or open-source models. Sometimes the answer is a combination.
Yes. Through my community network and industry relationships, I can connect you with the right people at major AI providers and cloud platforms. But I always recommend doing an assessment first so those conversations are focused and productive.
I focus on strategy, vendor selection, and team enablement. For heavy engineering work, I partner with implementation firms who can build what you need. I stay involved as a strategic advisor throughout.
It depends on scope. Assessments start at DKK 50,000. Implementation coaching retainers typically run DKK 25,000 to 40,000 per month. I'm transparent about pricing from the first conversation.
I'm happy to help with connections. I'd suggest a short call first so I can understand what you're trying to achieve and point you to the right person. That way the introduction actually leads somewhere useful.
Technology & Innovation Lead with 15+ years of experience driving digital transformation, AI adoption, and team empowerment across industries.
Learn more about meReady to make confident AI decisions?
Explore related articles and insights on this topic.
A 3.8B parameter model now matches GPT-4o on extraction tasks. Phi-4, Gemma 4, and Qwen 3.5 changed the calculus for what runs locally and what runs in the cloud. The shift isn't 'small models won' — it's hybrid as the default architecture. Here's the pattern that actually ships.
97 million monthly SDK downloads. Around 10,000 servers in the public registry. 41% of orgs in production. MCP didn't win loudly — it won the way infrastructure always wins. Here's what that means for how you procure systems now.
Karpathy's definition of context engineering is doing a lot of work. The hidden shift in 2026 is that memory has detached from the rest of context engineering and become its own product category — with five distinct design camps.
88% of organizations reported confirmed or suspected agent incidents last year. 45.6% still rely on shared API keys. Inside twelve months, agent identity moved from think piece to RFP line item. Here's what changed, and what good looks like now.
If this engagement fits, these adjacent services often come up in the same conversation.